Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×



Details

Submitted on
April 22, 2012
File Size
11.9 KB
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
1,037
Favourites
39 (who?)
Comments
19
Downloads
20

License

Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
×


Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through  greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives. Democracy and socialism go hand in hand. All over the world, wherever the idea of democracy has taken root, the vision of socialism has taken root as well—everywhere but in the United States. Because of this, many false ideas about socialism have developed in the US. With this pamphlet, we hope to answer some of your questions about socialism.

Doesn't socialism mean that the government will own and run everything?



Democratic socialists do not want to create an all-powerful government bureaucracy. But we do not want big corporate bureaucracies to control our society either. Rather, we believe that social and economic decisions should be made by those whom they most affect.

Today, corporate executives who answer only to themselves and a few wealthy stockholders make basic economic decisions affecting millions of people. Resources are used to make money for capitalists rather than to meet human needs. We believe that the workers and consumers who are affected by economic institutions should own and control them.

Social ownership could take many forms, such as worker-owned cooperatives or  publicly owned enterprises managed by workers and consumer representatives. Democratic socialists favor as much decentralization as possible. While the large concentrations of capital in industries such as energy and steel may necessitate some form of state ownership, many consumer-goods industries might be best run as cooperatives.

Democratic socialists have long rejected the belief that the whole economy should be centrally planned. While we believe that democratic planning can shape major social investments like mass transit, housing, and energy, market mechanisms are needed to determine the demand for many consumer goods.

Hasn't socialism been discredited by the collapse of Communism in the USSR and Eastern Europe?



Socialists have been among the harshest critics of authoritarian Communist states. Just because their bureaucratic elites called them "socialist" did not make it so; they also called their regimes "democratic." Democratic socialists always opposed the ruling party-states of those societies, just as we oppose the ruling  classes of capitalist societies.  We applaud the democratic revolutions that have transformed the former Communist bloc. However, the improvement of people's lives requires real democracy without ethnic rivalries and/or new forms of authoritarianism. Democratic socialists will continue to play a key role in that
struggle throughout the world. Moreover, the fall of Communism should not blind us to injustices at home. We cannot allow all radicalism to be dismissed as "Communist." That suppression of dissent and diversity undermines America's ability to live up to its promise of equality of opportunity, not to mention the freedoms of speech and assembly.

Private corporations seem to be a permanent fixture in the US, so why work towards socialism?



In the short term we can't eliminate  private corporations, but we can bring them under  greater democratic control. The government could use regulations and tax incentives to encourage companies to act in the public interest and outlaw destructive activities such as exporting jobs to low-wage countries and polluting our environment. Public pressure can also have a critical role to play in the struggle to hold corporations accountable. Most of all, socialists look to unions make private business more accountable.

Won't socialism be impractical because people will lose their incentive to work?



We don't agree with the capitalist assumption that starvation or greed are the only reasons people work. People enjoy their work if it is meaningful and enhances their lives. They work out of a sense of responsibility to their community and society. Although a long-term goal of socialism is to eliminate all but the most enjoyable kinds of labor, we recognize that unappealing jobs will long remain. These tasks would be spread among as many people as possible rather than distributed on the basis of class, race, ethnicity, or gender, as
they are under capitalism. And this undesirable work should be among the best, not the least, rewarded work within the economy. For now, the burden should be placed on the employer to make work desirable by raising wages, offering benefits and improving the work environment. In short, we believe that a combination of social, economic, and moral incentives will motivate people to work.

Why are there no models of democratic socialism?



Although no country has fully instituted democratic socialism, the socialist parties and labor movements of other countries have won many victories for their people. We can learn from the comprehensive welfare state maintained by the Swedes, from Canada's national health care system, France's nationwide childcare program, and Nicaragua's literacy programs. Lastly, we can learn from efforts initiated right here in the US, such as the community health centers created by the  government in the 1960s. They provided high  quality family care, with community involvement in decision-making.

But hasn't the European Social Democratic experiment failed?



For over half a century, a number of nations in Western Europe and Scandinavia have enjoyed both tremendous  prosperity and relative economic equality thanks to the  policies  pursued by social democratic parties. These nations used their relative wealth to insure a high standard of living for their citizens—high wages, health care and subsidized education. Most importantly, social democratic parties supported strong labor movements that became central  players in economic decision-making. But with the  globalization of capitalism, the old social democratic model becomes ever harder to maintain. Stiff competition from low-wage labor markets in developing countries and the constant fear that industry will move to avoid taxes and strong labor regulations has diminished (but not eliminated) the ability of nations to launch ambitious economic reform on their own. Social  democratic reform must now happen at the international level. Multinational corporations must be brought under democratic controls, and workers' organizing efforts must reach across borders.

Now, more than ever, socialism is an international movement. As socialists have always known, the welfare of working people in Finland or California depends largely on standards in Italy or Indonesia. As a result, we must work towards reforms that can withstand the power of multinationals and global banks, and we must fight for a world order that is not controlled by bankers and bosses.

Aren't you a party that's in competition with the Democratic Party for votes and support?



No, we are not a separate party. Like our friends and allies in the feminist, labor, civil rights, religious, and community organizing movements, many of us have been active in the Democratic Party. We work with those movements to strengthen the party's left wing, represented by the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

The process and structure of American elections seriously hurts third party  efforts. Winner-take-all elections instead of proportional representation, rigorous party qualification requirements that vary from state to state, a presidential instead of a parliamentary system, and the two-party monopoly on political power have doomed third party efforts. We hope that at some point in the future, in coalition with our allies, an alternative national party will be viable. For now, we will continue to support progressives who have a real chance at winning elections, which usually means left-wing Democrats.

If I am going to devote time to politics, why shouldn't I focus on something more immediate?



Although capitalism will be with us for a long time, reforms we win now—raising the minimum wage, securing a national health plan, and demanding passage of right-to-strike legislation—can bring us closer to socialism. Many democratic socialists actively work in the single-issue organizations that advocate for those reforms. We are visible in the reproductive freedom movement, the fight for student aid, gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered organizations, anti-racist groups, and the labor movement.

It is precisely our socialist vision that informs and inspires our day-to-day activism for social justice. As socialists we bring a sense of the interdependence of all struggles for justice. No single-issue organization can truly challenge the capitalist system or adequately secure its particular demands. In fact, unless we are all collectively working to win a world without oppression, each fight for reforms will be disconnected, maybe
even self-defeating.

What can young people do to move the US towards socialism?



Since the Civil Rights movement of the 1950s, young people have played a critical role in American politics. They have been a tremendous force for both political and cultural change in this country: in limiting  the US's options in the war in Vietnam, in forcing corporations to divest from the racist South African regime, in reforming universities, and in bringing issues  of sexual orientation and gender discrimination to  public attention. Though none of these struggles were fought by young people alone, they all featured  youth as leaders in multi-generational progressive coalitions. Young people are needed in today's struggles as well: for universal health care and stronger unions, against welfare cuts and predatory multinational corporations.

Schools, colleges and universities are important to American political culture. They are the places where ideas are formulated and policy discussed and developed. Being an active part of that discussion is a critical job for young socialists. We have to work hard to change people's misconceptions about socialism, to broaden political debate, and to overcome many students' lack of interest in engaging in political action. Off-campus, too, in our daily cultural lives, young people can be turning the tide against racism, sexism and homophobia, as well as the conservative myth of the virtue of "free" markets.

If so many people misunderstand socialism, why continue to use the word?



First, we call ourselves socialists because we are proud of what we are. Second, no matter what we call ourselves, conservatives will use it against us. Anti-socialism has been repeatedly used to attack reforms that shift power to working class people and away from corporate capital. In 1993, national health insurance was attacked as "socialized medicine"  and defeated. Liberals are routinely denounced as socialists in order to discredit reform. Until we face, and beat, the stigma attached to the "S word,"  politics in America will continue to be stifled and our options limited. We also call ourselves socialists because we are proud of the traditions upon which we are based, of the heritage of the Socialist Party of Eugene Debs and Norman Thomas, and of other struggles for change that have made America more democratic and just. Finally, we call ourselves socialists to remind everyone that we have a vision of a better world.
From the FAQ for the Democratic Socialists of America: [link]

So :iconmephistophilez: questioned my decision to stop believing in socialism, especially since I still support the ideals. It was a matter of practicality anyway, not ideology.

From what the Democratic Socialists of America stated about socialism, their brand of socialism sounds both possible and ideal.

Workers co-ops and nationalization of certain industries are already widespread in the social-democratic nations of Europe, so it seems quite possible for America.

So I hope this helps with any questions about socialism.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconsiontix:
Siontix Featured By Owner Jan 24, 2014
I was glad to have come across this. I recently became a Democratic Socialist and have convinced my girlfriend to follow me as one too. It's a system that sounds great and I feel that it's morally right.
Reply
:iconwrathfan99:
WrathFan99 Featured By Owner Aug 28, 2013  Student General Artist
I`m a Democratic Socialist with some moderate Left-Anarchist traits ( Particularly Green Anarchism and Mutualism ) . I`m also a Gnostic Atheist Humanist . 
Reply
:iconshiki-scarlet:
Shiki-Scarlet Featured By Owner May 14, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
I'm not too fond of democratic socialism thanks to Tony Blair and his new labor mockery or groups like the fabian society that have supported such governments which have honestly been more centre right neo conservate at best. Don't get me wrong I'm against dictatorships and Stalinism but I just feel democratic socialists in the EU have made far too many compromises and betrayed there values often.

I could be wrong however.
Reply
:iconbullmoose1912:
BullMoose1912 Featured By Owner May 14, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Is that really democratic socialism? New Labor is much farther to the right than labor originally was. It moved there in some attempt to try to regain voters.

Or so i've heard.
Reply
:iconcaturday2:
Caturday2 Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
The logo shown is that of a Social-democratic party...
Reply
:iconbullmoose1912:
BullMoose1912 Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
That's the logo of the Democratic Socialists of America. Where this Q&A is from.
Reply
:iconcaturday2:
Caturday2 Featured By Owner Apr 25, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
The title is a bit misleading, technically they are social democratic. Social democrats tend to call themselves socialists in some areas. For American politics, they are still too far left for most people it seems.
Reply
:iconhitokiri-coyote:
Hitokiri-Coyote Featured By Owner Apr 22, 2012  Student General Artist
Very nice. Thank you.
Reply
:iconatheosemanon:
AtheosEmanon Featured By Owner Apr 22, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I am a democratic socialist, as well as a liberal, and progressive and it reminds me a bit of a question someone asked me here, [link] the difference between libertarian socialism, which I find to be unrealistic and democratic socialism which I believe to be far more realistic and obtainable. We need a sense of national conservatism [not to be confused with the conservative ideology, national conservatism is what you see in many parts of Europe where they have things like universal health care, heavy investment in education and other measures that make the country better as a whole...]

It is such a shame that in one of the richest countries in the world, America that we have 50.7M people without health insurance, we have 50M people living below the poverty level and another 100M people making just enough to break even, that we on average spend 4x as much on our prison system than we do our education system ... I shall stop here, I do not wish to start ranting now..

Good day to you sir,

Back to my liberal, progressive, democratic socialist cave.
Reply
:iconbullmoose1912:
BullMoose1912 Featured By Owner Apr 22, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Unrelated, but you mention conservatism, and I thought about the Media Education Foundation who make videos decrying modern culture with its sexuality and "depravity" and stuff like that, and it seemed odd. The MEF is clearly a left-wing organization, but those who are not so knowledgeable about political ideology could easily mistake them for a social conservative organization, with people like Jack Thompson in mind.
Reply
Add a Comment: